discount cigarettes
Bond
Camel
Chesterfield
Cigaronne
Classic
Davidoff
Esse
Hilton
Glamour
Karelia
Kent
Kiss
Lady
L&M
Lucky Strike
Marlboro
Monte Carlo
More
Pall Mall
Parliament
Prima Lux
Red&White
R1
Sobranie
Viceroy
Virginia Slims
Vogue
West
Winston
Zevs
CIGARETTES NEWS
We invite people from all over the world to read cigarettes and tobacco related news from different sources around the net.
See all
cigarettes news...
CARDS
You can order your favorite cigarette brand using
Visa Card
.
FRIENDLY SITES
discount cigarettes
buy cigarettes online
buy Marlboro cigarettes
buy Parliament cigarettes
buy cheap Winston cigarettes
buy cheap Camel cigarettes
Smoking in the movies
Smoking is unhealthy, and movies can glamorize the habit. But how much censorship is too much? Ear-shattering explosions? Check. Gore splattered across the screen? No problem. Graphic sex scenes, or maybe a little torture porn? Bring it on. In Hollywood, anything goes these days -- except cigarette smoking. Rarely in the history of motion pictures have the forces of censorship been as successful as anti-smoking crusaders have been recently. Last year, after congressional hearings on the issue and a public call for a crackdown by 32 state attorneys general, the Motion Picture Assn. of America agreed to consider tobacco use along with sex and violence when determining a film's rating. Most of the major studios, meanwhile, have promised to either discourage or forbid smoking in youth-oriented films. That still doesn't satisfy activist groups such as the American Legacy Foundation or the
smoke
Free Movies project at UC San Francisco, which demand an R rating for any movie that depicts smoking (biopics about historical figures are excepted). To be sure, these groups have a point, one that was brought home Thursday when the National Cancer Institute released a comprehensive report on the media's influence on youth smoking. The agency analyzed studies from around the world, finding strong evidence that children exposed to on-screen smoking have a
More
positive attitude toward
Cigarettes
and that there's a link between youth smoking and exposure to movies. Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and although
Cigarettes
have fallen out of favor, about 20% of the adult population still
smoke
s. But how much censorship is too much when it comes to protecting public health? A cigarette can convey a tremendous amount of information about a character -- independence, anxiety, toughness or weakness, desperation and, yes, sex appeal. To rate a movie adults-only simply because a character takes a puff would reduce choices for filmmakers and audiences.
More
over, it's hard to see why smoking is
More
pernicious than other on-screen activities we take for granted, such as drug and alcohol use, violence and risky sexual behavior (all of which, like cigarette smoking, represent public health threats). There are better approaches than messing around with the ratings system. Last month, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced that the major studios had agreed to include anti-tobacco public service announcements produced by the state at the beginning of DVDs of films rated G, PG or PG-13 that depict smoking. The National Cancer Institute report concluded that these messages are effective in countering the glamorizing effects of on-screen tobacco use. The spots should be shown in theaters as well, though that would be harder to arrange because they'd cut into screen time nor
Mall
y devoted to paid ads or trailers. But if the MPAA responds to political pressure, the National Assn. of Theatre Owners might too.