discount cigarettes
Bond
Camel
Chesterfield
Cigaronne
Classic
Davidoff
Esse
Hilton
Glamour
Karelia
Kent
Kiss
Lady
L&M
Lucky Strike
Marlboro
Monte Carlo
More
Pall Mall
Parliament
Prima Lux
Red&White
R1
Sobranie
Viceroy
Virginia Slims
Vogue
West
Winston
Zevs
CIGARETTES NEWS
We invite people from all over the world to read cigarettes and tobacco related news from different sources around the net.
See all
cigarettes news...
CARDS
You can order your favorite cigarette brand using
Visa Card
.
FRIENDLY SITES
discount cigarettes
buy cigarettes online
buy Marlboro cigarettes
buy Parliament cigarettes
buy cheap Winston cigarettes
buy cheap Camel cigarettes
Tobacco Control Programs Reduce Health-Care Costs
In 1988, California voters approved spending tax dollars from an increased cigarette tax on an anti-smoking effort. The state's Tobacco Control Program was innovative for its time, according to Stan Glantz, who directs the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco. "It took a very strong approach directed around social norm change," he explains, rather than simply telling people not to
smoke
because it was bad, or telling kids they shouldn't start smoking. "It had very, very aggressive media, to create an environment to discourage smoking and help
smoke
rs quit. It had a strong emphasis on second-hand
smoke
and public policy interventions, particularly creating
smoke
-free environments,
smoke
-free workplaces,
smoke
-free public places." It also included a "quit line," which offered advice for callers who wanted to quit smoking. Glantz and his colleagues used statistical analysis to assess the program's performance during its first 15 years. They compared state spending on the control program between 1989 and 2004 to the decline in the smoking population, and compared that decline to what happened to personal health care costs – spending by individuals, insurance companies and the government. Then, using states that did not have tobacco control programs as the control group, Glantz says they compared what they estimated California's health care costs would have been had the program not been there, and compared that figure to what they actually were. "And what you find is if you had not had the California Tobacco Control Program, a lot
More
Cigarettes
would have been
smoke
d and health care costs would have been higher." Seven-point-three percent higher, to be exact. Glantz calls that effect "gigantic." A program that cost less than $2-billion over 15 years saved $86-billion in health care expenditures. And those costs began to drop in the program's first year. Glantz notes that similar tobacco control programs will soon become
More
common around the world because of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. "[It] is the first global public health treaty, it's sort of like the Kyoto [Climate Change] Accords for tobacco," he explains. The framework has been ratified by 157 countries so far. "One of articles in there commits the ratifying countries to develop and implement large-scale tobacco control programs." Stan Glantz says California's experience has shown that you can lower health care costs by reducing tobacco-induced disease, and that successful health care reform requires a large-scale tobacco control effort.